• And true New Yorker Steve G flips the bird to a CNN anchor who thinks a city-destroying hurricane in New York would be just dandy, less than a half-dozen years after the WTC attacks. Also good posts this week about sacrifice and how to treat soldiers.
Here's some more stuff I've found since yesterday, now that I've "finished the internet" again:
Best Blog Best Blog -- Pro Division Best Blog Community Best Writing Best Post Best Series Best Single Issue Blog Best Group Blog Most Humorous Blog Most Humorous Post Most Deserving of Wider Recognition Best Consonent Level Blog Best Expert Blog Best New Blog Best Human Equality Blog Best Coverage of State or Local Issues Best Commenter
Possible nominating categories for me might include Best Post (if you've enjoyed a particular essay of mine) or Best Series (for the Silly Sites) or Most Deserving of Wider Recognition, but the one for which I'd really like to be considered is a new category, Best Consonent Level Blog, which "seeks to recognize those moderate-sized blogs which have not yet, or perhaps are happy not to, reach the ranks of the 'A-listers'." And, considering the nature of this post, obviously I'd like to see the Liberal Coalition in the running for Best Blog Community.
• I've read two great food-for-thought posts today about rising above religion from Michael Bérubé and PZ Myers. Excerpts, first from Michael, about a conversation he had with a preacher-type a couple decades ago:
Right, here’s the way I look at it, I said. If you’re right about this and I’m wrong, then you and I agree that we have the obligation to treat others as we would have them treat us, but because I believe that we humans just made that up one day, I’m going to Hell for an eternity, and you’re pretty much in the clear. Whereas if I’m right about this and you’re wrong, my beliefs don’t visit any punishments on you. We live, we act as best we can, we die, end of story, except that we hope that maybe some of the good we do on earth will live after us for a little while. And that’s it.
Well, the Lawn Preacher said, I can’t say I’ve ever heard the argument for agnosticism put that way before.
Dang, that’s a shame, I said. Because lots of us agnostics have a coherent moral code. We just don’t feel the need to ascribe our moral code to a supernatural being. We don’t think that solves anything, honestly.
I think it's a fine idea to oppose the most malignant eruptions of religious thinking. However, I don't think it's enough to fight the nastiest symptoms while pretending the underlying disease is a beautiful thing. Sure, I'll join moderate Christians in arguing against the excess of fundamentalism, but that doesn't mean I have to retire from arguing against the inanity of faith; it's that lack of critical thought at the core of religious belief that allows fundamentalism to flourish.
It all reminds me a bit of how an atheist friend of mine recently explained his views, and I paraphrase: "There are people who do good, and people who are bad. Good people don't need incentive to do good things. Organized religion hasn't been proven to make bad people become good, but it's always served as a convenient excuse for otherwise good people to do bad things."
Speaking of which, the American Dialect Society has just released its winners and runners-up in its 17th annual Words of the Year vote. Here's the PDF with all the finalists. Now back to tackling that comp box of unread DC comics!