Friday, March 31, 2006

By the way, those pages are from Books of Doom #5, out now in your local comic shop...
Thursday, March 30, 2006
Wednesday, March 29, 2006
As long as I have some free time this evening (unlike during one of the more jam-packed workdays I've had in awhile) I wanted to acknowledge some cool feminist stuff taking place so I can close some windows:
• Ragnall has issued her second call for submissions to the 12th Carnival of Feminists. The deadline is Monday, April 3. She teases us with some Truly Awful Art, because I guess she couldn't deal with analyzing brilliant Neal Adams panels any more and wanted to rot her brain or something...
• You know that Stephanie McMillan cartoon that everyone's been reproing on their blogs? The one she's now selling the original of on eBay, all proceeds to go to Planned Parenthood of Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota, and the Oglala Sioux tribe? You know, this one?:

Well, Nancy Goldstein decided to call Napoli and left a message for him at his home to please call her back with advice on whether to use bacon or chorizo in her paella recipe, and he returned her call! Read all about it here on RawStory.
In other news:
• Susie's in the hospital with something that sounds very similar to what I went through last December. Get home as quickly as you can, Susie, and get well soon! I'm a phone call or email away if you need any advice.
• Deepest condolences to Echidne on the loss of her faithful canine companion Hank. Her remembrance is one of the most beautiful things I've read all year.
• Pandagon is back up, and just last week Amanda celebrated two years of blogging. (Fafblog also celebrated its third blogiversary last week, but while I consider them the funniest bloggers around they tend not to focus on feminism so they merit a scant parenthetical in this link dump...)
• Hugo Schwyzer has a great thought piece on teaching and student crushes. This one really hit home for me; in college I had a major crush on my Spanish teacher, a nice Jewish guy four years older than me named Sandy Cohen who lived a few blocks away from my parents, dated my best friend and my roommate, invited small groups of students to his house where he played guitar and partied with us, but still kept his distance from me one-on-one to the point of even writing me a "dear jane"-type letter. I still have the letter in my files, but the only line I memorized from it was "You are looking for something you must find in yourself," because I swiped the line and used it in a song (I wrote lots of songs in those days). And he was right, in that I was (and it wasn't until I was happy with myself that I could really appreciate loving someone else), but he was wrong also, because you don't date my best friend and my roommate and snub me like that even if maybe I wasn't really dateworthy material at the time, because you've already shown you don't believe in a student/teacher boundary anyway and, well, it was just cruel. But boy, could that guy teach. He was on fire. I wonder what he's doing now, and if he's still pretentiouslly calling himself "Sandro."
• Lastly, there's an excellent post by Paula Brantner at Stand Up Blog on business meetings at strip clubs, about which I generally feel the same way I do about contributing writing to soft-core porn sites. I may like the people involved, I may even think they have very worthwhile and important things to say, but I won't go to a venue whose primary purpose is to devalue and objectify half the population. And I think it's very rude, almost barbaric, to conduct business in a place whose attitude towards my gender effectively eliminates my participation.
Not only do I have insomnia again, but I think my blog has caught a bug.

Thanks a lot, Laura...
Tuesday, March 28, 2006
The almost-always-cool Wil Wheaton (one of Pen-Elayne's "blogfathers" and perpetually in my Top Six section) was gracious enough to respond to my query as to why he was so enthusiastically supporting a soft-porn site that's not only unwelcoming to any readers who don't particularly care to look at nude women but has an apparent history of exploiting their female employees in more ways than one. Wil doesn't "find their content offensive in any way" and that's understandable, because he's grown up looking at the world through a male gaze. Just one more impetus, methinks, to present our portion of the world with more female gazes! Please don't forget to vote for worthy women to add to the Pen-Elayne blogroll; just three days left!
Monday, March 27, 2006

The current face of the liberal blogosphere AKA the young boys' network

Preparation (otherwise known as "mis en place") for making my guacamole deviled eggs.

The final product, filled with eggy goodness!

And that's my keema matar, still in the pan.
And now the announcement: Robin drew and submitted line drawings from the first two photos above, and I provided the essay and accompanying recipes, for the just-out And They Cook, Too: A Blogger Fundraiser for Doctors Without Borders, edited by Ginger Mayerson and Kathy Flake and featuring contributions from Tild~ (who did the cover), Kathy Pearlman, Pam Spaulding, Lindsay Beyerstein, CE Petro, NTodd Pritsky, Jeanne d'Arc, Wayne at PSoTD, Trish Wilson, Linkmeister, and three people with whom I've had the pleasure of dining - Jenonymous, Julia, MadKane - as well as a number of folks whose recipes and blogs I look forward to discovering. (Alas, I don't see Melanie Mattson's name anywhere in the TOC I'm currently perusing, but please, folks, go to her blog for some of the best liberal politics + recipes anywhere!) Please consider purchasing a copy, it's for a good cause and I'm sure the recipes are yummy!This one's dedicated to Dr. Myers, 'cause I know how much he loves the things. Also to my ex, 'cause apparently "squids" is a nickname for sailors. Via Adorablog. Oh, and speaking of PZ, I just learned a new word from him: pareidolia, a psychological phenomenon usually involving an image being mistakenly perceived as recognizable. You know, like people thinking they see the faces of Jesus and/or Mary everywhere (particularly strange considering the lack of historic record of what these faces looked like).
Sunday, March 26, 2006
I must admit, I really applauded Roxanne's comment about perspective vis a vis the rightie plagiarist briefly hired as the Washington Post blogger. (Sounds like a cheesy villain type, doesn't it? "Beware the Wrath of the Washington Post Blogger! mwahahaha...") But then I read Leigh Anne's Blog Like Ben offering and thought, maybe I should have given more notice to this even though 99 out of 100 times I ignore or completely skim over what liberal bloggers say conservative bloggers are doing because I won't really get the in-jokes otherwise.
And then I read August's very thoughtful piece about why it's a good thing to talk at length about what's going on in the cozy relationships between the mainstream news media (TV, newspapers of record, similar corpo-driven communications enterprises with huge ad revenues) and an extremely partisan perspective in favor of the people currently charged with running our country, one that delights in spin and confers authority upon the unworthy in much the same way they do in Washington.
And I concluded, you know what? I just don't have the time to care about the irony surrounding wonky liberal bloggers complaining about whiny conservative bloggers accusing wonky liberal bloggers of being whiners. I have enough whine in my own head to suffice me for the rest of my life, I've found a little public wonkiness goes a long way, and I'm just here for the free crisps, mate.
Yes, it's important to keep pointing out the sleazy and corrupt and hypocritical activities going on around us. But as part of a greater whole (the selling of the media to a profit motive, for instance), not an obsession in and of itself posted in large measure because you want your readers to think you have cogent quips that they haven't already thought themselves. It's almost like a high-school game, to see which blogger best and most maliciously mocks other bloggers who don't share his or her viewpoint. And they figure they have a ready-made excuse for this: "they started it!"
Of course they did. But not by themselves, and that's not the point anyway. Here's what I think is the point: when serious issues are breaking out all over us, compounding daily with interest, nobody outside of our little corner is going to be paying relatively that much attention to the kids throwing sand at each other. They're going to want to learn more about the stuff that actually matters to them. They're already paying attention in greater and greater numbers. Good writers in the liberal blogosphere ought to take advantage of that thirst for truth, instead of living out Charles Atlas revenge fantasies of kicking sand in the bullies' faces. It may provide a momentary laugh (which value I don't downplay at all) but doesn't really humiliate those bullies in real life, it just feeds into their rigged damned-if-you-do-and-damned-if-you-don't talking points ("liberals are whiners") and winds up making the whole exchange All About You instead of all about communicating with fellow readers and citizens.
So um, I guess I agree with Roxanne.
Five days left to vote some "new blood" onto my News+Views Gals sidebar! Congratulations to all the blogs that made Civil Liberties Blog Central's Top 10 Blogs on Feminism and Women's Rights! Six of them (Feministing, Echidne, Alas, a Blog, Feministe, Hugo Schwyzer and Majikthise) are already on my blogroll, two are sponsored (Planned Parenthood's Now What? and Amnesty International's Stop Violence Against Women), and the other two (The Happy Feminist and Kortney Ziegler's blac(k)ademic) are on my Where the Women Bloggers Are bookmark list, waiting to be voted on along with (at last count) 106 other worthy candidates, so come on and start voting in the comments section below! Here's the full rundown of the "rules" for those who came in a bit late...
Week of 3/19 thru 3/25/06
• Alex at Sooner Thought warns us that Halliburton's coming to his back yard. Yikes, run away!
• Andante at Collective Sigh brags about her daughter, as well she should!
• Bryant Gries at Make Me A Commentator!! has gone all Goon Show on us. Not that I'm complaining!
• Echidne of the Snakes examines that deceptive "freedom" that never seems to be defined. Frankly, I think to many conservatives "freedom" and "free markets" are one and the same; it's the freedom of rich people to exploit everyone else while they acquire stuff.
• The Farmer at farm runoff explains what salvia is. I'd never heard of this plant before, either the "benign" one that grows in these parts or the divinorum hallucinogenic variety that's found pretty much only in Singapore.
• John at archy is perhaps too excited about an upcoming mammoth movie. Geez, I have no idea why, it's not like it's snakes on a plane or anything.
• Steve Gilliard at The News Blog has lots of tasty stuff, as usual, including examining the right's tendency toward more open racism of late, displaying a modern recruitment poster, and reminding us why the old boys' network is alive and well.
• Trish Wilson tells us which of the top 100 must-read sf books she's actually read. A lot of them aren't on my list because I got tired of feeling left out of the fun (identifying-with-character-wise) because I was female. Of the list, I count only nine by women, and to my recollection I've read 19 of the 100 listed, which sounds about right as I have little interest in some of the male authors and heretically suspect the movies made from their tomes are probably more interesting than the original text in many cases.
• upyernoz at rubber hose has fond memories of the Queen of the North.
• Lastly, given my Bloglines feed-reading problems the past few days, I'd be remiss if I didn't acknowledge those LC members whose feeds haven't been working properly due to no fault of their own. Keith Kisser at Invisible Library invites us to download his new book (I've just downloaded the PDF), and Mike from Left is Right has tons and tons of cool sites for us to peruse.
Saturday, March 25, 2006
Via Julia: "When you see this, post an anti-war song in your journal."
Here's my choice:
Oh I marched to the battle of New Orleans
At the end of the early British war
The young land started growing
The young blood started flowing
But I ain't marchin' anymore
For I've killed my share of Indians
In a thousand different fights
I was there at the Little Big Horn
I heard many men lying
I saw many more dying
But I ain't marchin' anymore
It's always the old to lead us to the war
It's always the young to fall
Now look at all we've won with the sabre and the gun
Tell me is it worth it all
For I stole California from the Mexican land
Fought in the bloody Civil War
Yes I even killed my brother
And so many others
And I ain't marchin' anymore
For I marched to the battles of the German trench
In a war that was bound to end all wars
Oh I must have killed a million men
And now they want me back again
But I ain't marchin' anymore
(chorus)
For I flew the final mission in the Japanese sky
Set off the mighty mushroom roar
When I saw the cities burning
I knew that I was learning
That I ain't marchin' anymore
Now the labor leader's screamin' when they close the missile plants,
United Fruit screams at the Cuban shore,
Call it "Peace" or call it "Treason,"
Call it "Love" or call it "Reason,"
But I ain't marchin' any more.
Got that from here.
Friday, March 24, 2006
In honor of the woman who probably influenced me more than any other (just got off the phone with Mom); in the hopes that despite this evening's relapse (after waiting for a homeward-bound bus for 15 minutes in the biting wind after, ironically, the pharmacy told me my medicine wouldn't be ready for a couple of hours) I think I'm finally getting over this month-long cough; and considering we still have a week left in March, I've decided to do a truncated version of last year's not-quite-good-enough-for-the-Koufax-finals Estrogen Month. As you may recall, this was a month-long event wherein I attempted to introduce readers (and myself) to new voices in the feminist blogosphere, via holding weekly polls wherein folks could vote to add names to my regular reading list and sidebar blogroll.
So I'll get to the "rules" of this year's version in a minute, but first I wanted to mention that I've added a few names on my own, women who'd either inadvertently been dropped or weren't added and should have been or had me blogrolled and I'd neglected to reciprocate. So welcome (back) to the blogroll, Riggsveda and News Writer and Terry and especially Ilyka Damen, for whom this has been Blog Against the Strawfeminist Week. Do click through the link above to read her entire (and very amusing) intro, and then read about bipolar strawfeminism (positively link-crazy and brilliantly written!) and playing name that quote year and repurposing Animal Farm and getting feedback and pop, pop, pop culture and *gulp* castration and, at last, a search for definition. Nice job this past week, Ilyka!
Now, to the "rules," such as they are:
• If you click on my Bloglines subscriptions and go down to the 7th and 8th categories, you'll see two sections called "Where the Women Bloggers Are." This where I bookmark my "gals in waiting" blogs, ones that were brought to my attention but which aren't yet on my official sidebar blogroll and regular reading list.
• Peruse these two sections as much as you like, particularly the first one, which has blogs that I found of more specific interest to me (and all the links are current as I just went through them today to make sure). The sections are listed alphabetically by blogger name/handle, with the blog name following in parentheses.
• If you see one or more blogs there that you personally adore, or that you simply cannot believe aren't on my regular list yet, speak up in the comments section attached to this post and the "countdown" comment sections to follow in the next week. Please make some sort of case (it doesn't have to be long, a sentence or two is just fine) for why you think I should add your blogger(s) of choice to my blogroll, and why other Pen-Elayne readers should check out her/their blog(s).
• You can, of course, give a shout-out yourself to be added to my blogroll if you're not there already! If you have or know of a female-written blog that isn't listed in the "Where The Women Bloggers Are" sections, and you don't see the blogger's name anywhere in my sidebar sections (under Liberal Coalition, News+Views Gals, Kultcha Gals, Dynamic Duos and Group Blogs), please let me know about it!!
• On Friday, March 31, I'll tally everyone's votes and add the top vote-getters to my sidebar. Meanwhile, everyone keep checking the comments sections to find out, as I hope I will be, about some great female-run blogs out there!
Now, if only my Atom feed starts working again I'll be a happy camper...
Speaking of which, Gary has a problem with the #1 movie hype of any given week. I can relate, I actually heard a Chicken Little ad touting it as "Disney's #1 animated movie of 2005" and I didn't notice the word "Disney" at first, then Robin pointed out to me that it was their only animated movie in 2005...
Colleen muses about horse (and house) country down VA-way.
I'm very, very pleased that Ragnell is hosting the next Carnival of the Feminists.
Sandra discusses the inking process. Geez, don't I get enough of this at home? :)
Anne muses at length about the imminent decline of the American empire. "What worries me is that they can make it true...by making people believe it's true."
Eric interviews the courageous and savvy President of the Oglala Sioux, Cecilia Fire Thunder.
Chris has posted his Time.com story about the current situation in Iraq.
Maia has a great post up at Alas, A Blog about people mistakenly equating beauty with health (and, of course, defining beauty way too, erm, narrowly)...
Glenn announces his upcoming book. Tom's book is out now. Ah, I vaguely remember when I used to have time to read books...
Greg makes the compelling observation that Operation Iraqi Liberation is a success, in that "Yes, Bush went in for the oil -- not to get more of Iraq's oil, but to prevent Iraq producing too much of it."
I'm glad I was right to pay no attention to Ben Domenech. As a rule I pay little to no attention to any right-wing blogger; it's all I can do to keep up with the liberal and lefty ones! If you have to ask "who's Ben Domenech?", you're my kinda blogger...
Time to go home! If I'm a good girl and finally do another Estrogen Month post tonight, can I have my RSS feed back, Blogger/Bloglines?
Thursday, March 23, 2006
Wednesday, March 22, 2006
Tuesday, March 21, 2006
Robin tells me I should let people know I've posted three updates to the post I first made on Thursday about Arianna Huffington and George Clooney, because people who don't read Pen-Elayne via its RSS feed don't know about the updates, and also because the NY Times has now reported on the affair, naturally sneering at HuffPo for not practicing journalism (which blogging isn't), which it seems to interpret as "stirring up a tempest in a teapot two full days after the whole mess has ended."
Monday, March 20, 2006
Boss in early, expected nausea and abdominal cramps from the antibiotics are kicking in (but the cough/phlegm/post-nasal-drip/whatever is still with me and, if anything, is increasing), not feely so good. Mondays; ick. Don't even know what silly site to choose... eeny meeny... how about Warning Signs for the Web, via Ann Bartow?
Sunday, March 19, 2006
Week of 3/12 thru 3/18/06
• Andante of Collective Sigh presents her laundry list for 2008 Presidential hopefuls.
• All your base are belong to us! If we're the base of the Democratic Party (and I don't think we are, not so's they'd notice at least - most of them are too busy still suckling the teat of the conservative Republican-lite DLC to notice what their actual constituency is saying) then, asks Jane Hamsher, how we can we make it any clearer what positions they need to support, and support strongly, in order to respond to our concerns? Steve Gilliard of The News Blog thinks it's that they don't trust their own hearts. Echidne of the Snakes despairs of the Dems as well (as so many liberal bloggers have this past week), noting, "How do you like them choices: either Attila the Hun or someone cowering in the corner, waiting, waiting." Nope, don't like 'em at all...
• Both NTodd Pritsky from Dohiyi Mir and Kathy Kattenburg at Liberty Street have zeroed in on Jennifer Loven's AP article about Bush arguing with strawmen during his speeches. It doesn't come as a surprise at all that this fellow essentially talks to (and has arguments with) himself; that's what's behind the Graydon Carter observation as well, isn't it, that "He speaks to the audience as if they're idiots. I think the reason he does that is because that's the way these issues were explained to him." Norbizness of Happy Furry Puppy Story Time figures that as long as Bush is actually talking to himself, why not put words in his mouth more relevant to what's actually going on (not to mention more amusing)?
• Steve Gilliard is still the only blogger I read who's critiquing the Dutch. Perhaps that's because he wasn't one of those who went on the Amsterdam junket. He also has a fascinating article about transracial adoption.
• Bryant Gries at Make Me A Commentator!! highly doubts that rock and roll is dead. I agree; since Air America screwed over Marc Maron and I've switched to FM music stations for my commute, much of the new music I'm hearing is just as good as the old stuff. Bryant also shakes his head at conservative pundits who go out of their way in refusing to understand the difference between reality and metaphor.
• A couple great Estrogen Month posts from Echidne - one about harems and one about the prominence of women in the progressive media (as with other areas, we're actually all over the place, but as long as "prominence" is male-defined and the media of whatever political stripe is owned by men, well, you know the rest).
• Jeff at Speedkill takes a look at Christian blasphemy, Canadian style.
• John at archy has little patience for the latest round of "we've found Noah's Ark!" Mustang Bobby at Bark Bark Woof Woof has had it with the HHS folks who suggest stocking up on canned tuna will help in a pandemic, in the same way duct tape helped stave off anthrax. And upyernoz at rubber hose is none too thrilled with the AAA, which opposes PA's clean vehicles program and apparently has quite the anti-environmental history. And Mike at Left is Right is beyond disgusted with the results of the latest Congressional report card on the Bush Administration.
• Lastly, Eryk at And Then... flips us the bird. But, you know, in a good way.
Saturday, March 18, 2006
A clarification about the filer we restored yesterday: This machine is indeed up and functioning again, so the affected blogs are no longer entirely inaccessible. However, it is still not in great shape and we are in the process of moving all the data off of it and on to better machines. So over the next few days there may still be lingering and intermittent problems for some blogs. This includes the "forbidden" errors we're all getting tired of, as well as occasional publishing errors, or incompletely published pages. If you get an error viewing a blog, refreshing the page once or twice should clear it. For publishing problems, simply wait a few minutes and republish, and that should take care of it. Thanks for your patience while we work on clearing all this up.
I see the "visited states" game is making the rounds again, so now that Blogger is (fingers crossed) fixed, I refer folks to this post from two years ago, wherein I mapped my visited US states, UK counties, countries in the world and even planets in the solar system (as far as I know I've only visited Earth). As I mentioned at the time, however, there are a number of states not marked in red below because I visited them with my parents when they drove cross-country over 47 years ago and I don't remember any of that because I was one year old. So, Mom and Dad, here's my visited-states map again:
Which other states should I be marking in red as having visited?
P.S. I love what Anne Zook did with this map on her site, making it a map of countries whose residents visited her blog...
Just a reminder, with all the screwiness Blogger has had of late (I'm still having trouble posting), folks who use the service may wish to back up their templates and save them to their hard drives. I just realized I hadn't pasted an updated template into my MS Word files in a couple months, so that's now taken care of.
Friday, March 17, 2006
Yes, me like the new Doctor Who episodes, which yes, I know are actually last year's model. But then I'm easy to please, I even liked the Mary Sue-ish TV movie from a few years back.
Still major problems with Blogger... sorry... hope to get in cat-blogging later but it may have to go by the wayside... I may just give up for awhile and post to my LiveJournal...
Top o' the morning'! Sayeth Blogger, "The filer that we have been having trouble with in the last few days failed again. Those blogs that are stored on the bad filer are temporarily not available for publishing and viewing." I can publish to mine but y'all can't view it unless you're reading the RSS feed. I need a drink. [Update 4:00 PM EST: Should be fixed now, although my ability to post keeps cutting in and out like a crazy monkey; hi all!] Have you ordered your Guinness Surger yet? Yes, Rob wants one (or as he says, "one for every room"). Via Jason.
Thursday, March 16, 2006
That's the name of the AP photographer who took this photo:

[Here's the uncropped shot.]
Now the cat's out of the bag and everyone will know it was really my husband who talked John Bolton into voting against establishing a UN Human Rights Council (do click on that link, the accompanying picture is much funnier). Not that I can read his mind or anything, but perhaps he did it because he didn't think the US looked bad enough in the eyes of the world. [Seriously, it's scary how many people Robin looks like...]
When the Huffington Post group blog began I admit I had the same caveat lector trepidation I usually reserve for celebrity-filled blogs. Because so many of them are living in a world where Their People do everything for them short of bathroom visits, and because so many are - like non-celebrities - fairly neophobic, I usually assume that any blog with their name on it isn't written by them. Also, it's pretty easy to spot the exceptions - Rosie O'Donnell (whose entries I quite like despite the freeform poetry-prose she uses), Wil Wheaton (whom I'll always consider the first true celeblogger), Margaret Cho, David Byrne, even Pete Townsend when he chooses to update. And since celebs like Harry Shearer have done a great job on HuffPost, their index is chock-full of other celebs who've occasionally posted, and the celeb in question last Monday is well known for his liberal views, there was no reason to doubt that the following post from was real:
I Am a Liberal. There, I Said It!Great post, referenced in lots of places in the lefty blogosphere. Thing is, though, as it turns out it doesn't actually fit the definition of a blog post - i.e., a piece of one-to-many writing composed at a computer by the person whose byline appears atop the entry - as it wasn't in fact written by Clooney, but rather culled from various statements he made in interviews and structured by Huffington to look like a blog post.
By George Clooney on Iraq
I am a liberal. And I make no apologies for it. Hell, I'm proud of it.
Too many people run away from the label. They whisper it like you'd whisper "I'm a Nazi." Like it's dirty word. But turn away from saying "I'm a liberal" and it's like you're turning away from saying that blacks should be allowed to sit in the front of the bus, that women should be able to vote and get paid the same as a man, that McCarthy was wrong, that Vietnam was a mistake. And that Saddam Hussein had no ties to al-Qaeda and had nothing to do with 9/11.
This is an incredibly polarized time (wonder how that happened?). But I find that, more and more, people are trying to find things we can agree on. And, for me, one of the things we absolutely need to agree on is the idea that we're all allowed to question authority. We have to agree that it's not unpatriotic to hold our leaders accountable and to speak out.
That's one of the things that drew me to making a film about Murrow. When you hear Murrow say, "We mustn't confuse dissent with disloyalty" and "We can't defend freedom at home by deserting it at home," it's like he's commenting on today's headlines.
The fear of been criticized can be paralyzing. Just look at the way so many Democrats caved in the run up to the war. In 2003, a lot of us were saying, where is the link between Saddam and bin Laden? What does Iraq have to do with 9/11? We knew it was bullshit. Which is why it drives me crazy to hear all these Democrats saying, "We were misled." It makes me want to shout, "Fuck you, you weren't misled. You were afraid of being called unpatriotic."
Bottom line: it's not merely our right to question our government, it's our duty. Whatever the consequences. We can't demand freedom of speech then turn around and say, But please don't say bad things about us. You gotta be a grown up and take your hits.
I am a liberal. Fire away.
At first I couldn't figure out the entire story, as all I saw was Huffington's explanation-slash-pseudo-apology which followed. But thanks to Jane Hamsher I found this blog post by Elizabeth Snead at the LA Times, which gives a fairly complete rundown of events (including updates).
Snead follows up with what may be the real story behind the story - basically, Clooney's People on the left hand didn't connect with Clooney's People on the right hand. See, in Hollywood folks like Clooney have personal publicists (the snubbed guy whom Arianna didn't even know) and independent publicists that handle various projects on which they work (the gal to whom Arianna actually spoke) and I wouldn't doubt at all that those publicists have publicists. So it's not a matter of Clooney not standing behind the words attributed to him - which he does, make no mistake - but of his guy getting snubbed (as well as the words appearing not really being a post by Clooney because, after all, the guy can write and probably would have wanted to structure something for HuffPost in his doubtless copious free time if Arianna had been a bit more patient).
Obviously this is all mountains-out-of-molehills with a hefty dose of typical Lalaland bullshit thrown in, but the end result is a lot of people asking, as a commenter did in a response to Snead's follow-up (which comment also mentioned a Walter Cronkite post actually being culled from a letter Cronkite had sent to the Drug Policy Alliance), "How many other 'phony bloggers' are posting at Huffington??"
The Huffington Post doesn't need more participation; it already churns out a few dozen posts a day by its various writers. And it doesn't need more celebrity appeal, judging by its index. So why does Arianna feel the need to mislabel stuff she's reprinted from elsewhere as being a blog post by the person who spoke or wrote the words she's reprinting? And why remove the Clooney post in its entirety (unless she was asked to) rather than just adding a disclaimer or other parenthetical stating where the words are from? It's not like there isn't a method for doing this. Lots of bloggers repro important and interesting things (speeches, columns, letters, interview excerpts) from other sources, sometimes with links and sometimes without. None of the bloggers reprinting Paul Krugman's NY Times columns are claiming to be Krugman. In her haste to jump the gun and make her blog seem more exclusive and important than it actually is, Huffington has shot herself in the foot here. And the shame of it is, The Huffington Post is already interesting and informative and celeb-laden enough that none of this was necessary. Sometimes eagerness and good intentions are a bad combination.
Update #1: Apparently Arianna still doesn't get it. It's not that she "repurposed" Clooney's words from interviews, it's that she didn't label them as repurposed - she made them into a blog post and signed his name to it. She seems willfully myopic about how much negative press this loss of credibility has garnered; all she sees is that the post got an "overwhelmingly positive response and provok[ed] a great deal of valuable discussion." Can someone please clue her in? Otherwise people are going to keep wondering if that's really Jack Klugman or Alec Baldwin and it'll just keep going on like that and pretty soon there will be no reason to believe anyone there is who she says they are.
Update #2: Finally, I think she's got it.
Update #3: Hey look, the NY Times discovers the story, only two days after it's all played out! Apparently that's called journalism!
Wednesday, March 15, 2006
...but still worthwhile reading. Hats off to all these estrogen-bearers!
Avedon Carol on the latest volley in the culture wars about how many progressives are falling for the conservative meme about how the left is godless. You know, the side that actually strives to practice what the esteemed prophets preached, throw out the hypocrites and mammonites, etc.
Barbara O'Brien on our napping yet overworked administration - a great comparison between things said five years ago and today.
Nona Williams is running an interesting contest - the best name-based neologism wins a Flying Spaghetti Monster car emblem! I'd say something like Holy (Wholly) Stoned to describe Sharon Stone's press conference behavior in Israel but that's pretty lame so I'll leave it to the experts.
Amanda has some great posts up - on the words of a woman punching strawfeminists about sex; the difficulty of running a feminist blog that attracts trolls (not a problem for me - as I see it, deleting trollish comments from a blog you run is not a free speech issue at all, and the more these idiots cry "censorship" the more they show that they have no clue as to what censorship actually means); preaching about the knee-jerk anti-religious left, tongue firmly in the other cheek she's just turned; and a terrific thoughtful piece about how forced-childbirth advocates are only following "natural" orders. Ya wohl!
Go wish Trish Wilson a belated happy birthday. And send some good vibes in Susie's direction.
Tuesday, March 14, 2006
Monday, March 13, 2006
Since the Koufax Awards got kinda glitchy and first round voting is being extended one more day, I won't open up Estrogen Month voting (with accompanying explanation) until at least tomorrow. Maybe by that point my cough will be all but gone. I hate when flu season morphs right into
I'm also keeping up pretty well with both comics and blogs at the moment. I have a few months' worth of one more Wildstorm title to skim through then I'm caught up with the entire DC comp boxes so far (did I mention Birds of Prey #92 comes out this Wednesday?); and, at the moment, my Bloglines subs show unread blogs in only four categories and a total of maybe 350 unread posts - doable in a couple hours at most. In all my blog reading I've also beefed up my saved Silly Site links so I won't have to go searching for awhile. Here's one that really caught my fancy (pun intended), an amusing blog purportedly written by a pigeon called Brian who hangs out in London with his pigeon'y mates. Via Xeni at BoingBoing, natch.
Sunday, March 12, 2006
As pointed out by both Justin at Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy and Mark Evanier at News From ME, it might have been nice if someone, anyone on Bill Maher's panel this past week had reminded Larry Miller and their viewing public of the FISA provision that says you can get a warrant up to 72 hours after the fact if you're wiretapping suspected terrorists. This is vitally important to keep hammering in - that liberals aren't "soft on terror," but rather that conservatives (at least the ones in power) are soft on the rule of law.
Week of 3/5 thru 3/11/06
• Death was on the minds of many LC members this week, as Natalie at All Facts and Opinions pays tribute to Dana Morosini Reeve, Mustang Bobby at Bark Bark Woof Woof (among others) remembers Gordon Parks, and Michael at Musing's Musings assures the dead dictator Milosevic that he won't be missed.
• Life does continue, however, and a few LC'ers celebrated PZ Myers' birthday this past week by doing some very good science blogging, like Coturnix's latest roundup and John's reproing a picture of PZ's favorite icon.
• Both Uptown Ruler at Scrutiny Hooligans and Echidne warn against sushi (actually, the mercury levels found therein in some CA restaurants, as well as the "food uniformity act"). Lalalala, I can't hear you, lalalala...
• None of the male-run A-list bloggers seemed to notice International Women's Day - heck, even Arianna's Huffington Post didn't mention it! - but LC members blogged about it, as well as blogging against sexism. Here are posts from Echidne, Bryant at Make Me A Commentator!!!, and two good ones from T. Rex.
• In other news, Scrutiny Hooligans scores an interview with Dr. J. Wendell Runion, Jane Hamsher at Firedoglake name-drops all over the place, so does Echidne but in her case it's goddess stuff, and Scott at ...You Are A Tree is extremely excited about Spore.
• Steve Gilliard takes a look at how the Dutch want to ban burqas. I wonder how many progressive bloggers who got those free trips to Amsterdam are going to write about this; so far the total seems to be zero, so I stand by my theory about them being successfully bought off.
• Last but not least, Mustang Bobby makes an interesting connection between Bush's current standing in the polls and the latest bullshit terror warning. 'Twas ever thus...
As a final reminder, lots of LC member blogs, including Pen-Elayne, are nominated for various Koufax Awards and the first-round voting ends today. Personally I think it would be very nice if ever LC member votes for the Liberal Coalition in the category of Best Blog Community.
Ah good, I can do some serious bloggy catch-up now that Blogger has resynched its RSS feed and I'm not getting any more of those feed-error exclamation points on Bloglines. But first, another episode of a delusional "sighting" of someone's idea of what Jesus looks like replicated in foodstuffs, reported by Pam, led to Sabina Becker's recommendation in the post's comment section of Cheesus Industries - Behold the Power of Cheesus! Alas, they don't appear to actually have any product available yet, but I love the idea...
Saturday, March 11, 2006
Those conversations stuck in my head, and last night I dug out the Flonase from the back of the linen closet shelf and started using it again, and while my chest and throat still feel a bit stuffy this morning I'm hardly coughing at all. Even though I think my doc is sometimes too quick to prescribe stuff, particularly stuff of which she receives free samples, I do like the flowery smell of the Flonase as I inhale it. And if it actually works, who am I to complain? So I think I'm finally moving forward a bit, and having caught up on my immediate finances (we hope to do our taxes tomorrow) and blog-reading (I've even voted in all the Koufax Awards categories - remember, first-round polls close tomorrow! - except Best Post, Blog Most Deserving of Wider Recognition and Best New Blog, as I want to actually read through the entries first which has been my plan for some time) I think I'm in pretty good shape. I'm even going to try getting on the bike again today, for the first time in at least a month. So here's to the coming spring, a time of renewal both within and without, and let's hope we keep El Nino at bay (via Lauren at Feministe).
Friday, March 10, 2006
Let's see if these updates get circulated as widely as the original bits were:
Via Angie, that teen sending text messages to her mom saying she'd been kidnapped and was being held in a basement made the whole thing up.
And that "live-action Simpsons opening" video reproed on so many blogs this past week has been declared a viral marketing success in promoting Sky One, so I'm sure Rupert Muroch congratulates the blogosphere on once again being a useful tool in more ways than one.
George W. Bush ran in 2000 on, among other things, the promise that he'd be a "CEO President," but the signs were all there, throughout his entire career, that he was a failed CEO at every company he'd been handed. Why on earth did so many voters ignore this matter of public record and believe he'd actually be competent? Moreover, why did so many persist in believing in Bush's competence as President in 2004 even after so many events had proven otherwise?And I'd have loved to have seen Bartlett's response.
And so I concluded that all three of these posts were, in the end, really all about the culture of male privilege and entitlement, and how so many, particularly in this country with its hyper-emphasis on individuality (which makes sense if the people in power don't want the folks without power who far outnumber them to engage in collective action against them, but that's another essay) are raised to believe that to be a man is to control your own destiny and, by extension, everything around you. And how all these things that Mark and Dwight and Cheryl talk about involve a lack of control that's interpreted as a loss of control, and to lose control (of your time, of your bodily functions, of the people around you, of your war) therefore implies that you're a failure as a man.
Never mind that women are (and ought to be) autonomous beings. Once they are impregnated, the above logic dictates that they are defined by the men who impregnate them, and who therefore have rights (both personal and legislative) over their incubators. Never mind that one can choose to turn off any electronic entertainment device at any time; one Must Keep Up to remain in the know! Never mind that the human body is a complicated and mysterious thing - if it doesn't obey one's every command at will there's something obviously wrong with it.
It's almost like a child believing that if he closes his eyes the world disappears. "Of course it's All About Us. We're told over and over again that we're the masters of our own fate!" And for an overwhelming number of these men, a lie repeated often enough becomes gospel. Because the alternative - the facts that they're not the center of their universe, that collective and cooperative action is often preferable to and accomplishes more than individual endeavor, and that there are just some things that one (male) human being cannot and never did control - is just too frightening to contemplate.
Thursday, March 09, 2006
Did you know that every state in the US has a tourism board, with websites chock full of resources? For instance, here's a listing of all of South Dakota's tourism associations, complete with phone and fax numbers as well as web links. Perhaps some folks might want to get in touch with any or all of these boards to let them know why the state won't be getting any of their tourist income.
Only six more days until Birds of Prey #92 hits the shelves! Well, for you, at least. To quote Columbia re: Frank 'N' Furter's laboratory, "I've seen it!" (What I haven't seen are these mysterious Robin Riggs-inked JSA pages the solicitation mentions... perhaps they were thinking of LSH [Legion of Super Heroes] or Supermen of America or Green Arrow or Flash or any number of other DC books on which he's worked...)
Oh frabjous day, callooh callay, I chortle in my joy! A coughless chortle, yet! Well, I'm not entirely over this horrid illness, but I haven't had any major fits yet, just a single cough here and there. And I have my full voice back! Still, I'm nowhere near 100%, so I'm not going near the stationary bike yet, and I didn't bring the Buckley's with me but I do have cough drops and another lemon to do my hot water/honey/lemon routine again, as that seemed to help a lot yesterday. Anyway, it's nice to be able to take deep breaths again and not collapse into coughing spasms. And just as spring is in the air! Here's a handy sunrise and sunset calculator if you want to keep track of the lengthening days, via Hanan Levin.
This TV series sounds cool; I hope it's shown in the US soon.
I'm very happy Snopes has an RSS feed; they've just debunked the "blondes will be extinct in less than 200 years" bit that's been floating about again.
Morgaine found an interesting National Geographic article wherein anthropologist Robert Sussman concludes that prehistoric humans were not in fact warlike, according to the fossil record.
Of course by now everyone's heard of the discovery of what appears to be water on one of Saturn's moons, Enceladus.
Lastly, the NYSE is eating its own young... oh sorry, that's not science, is it?
Wednesday, March 08, 2006
I've been a secretary for over 25 years, long enough to see my designation go from "typist" to "executive administrative professional" or whatever multisyllabic nonsense is currently in vogue. I started as a speed-typist at an appellate printer in the days before computers became plentiful in the business world, when we programmed short macros into our electronic typewriters so we wouldn't have to type the same frequently-used phrases over and over. I remember carbon paper and dot-matrix printers and switchboards with plugs. I also remember joining 9to5 and hearing horror stories about secretaries having to do personal work for their bosses like picking up dry cleaning and making/serving them coffee or lunch, and hoping I'd never be in that type of servile position.
We didn't know how good we had it in those days.
From what I've seen on the job boards I still peruse, the modern executive secretary is not only expected to be organized and make online travel arrangements and have expertise in the usual suite of computer programs, but it is often assumed she or he will also be doing a fair amount of personal scheduling for her or his boss(es), particularly if the boss in question is a CEO. Which not only infuriates me but confuses me - modern communication has made it so easy for just about anyone, especially the online-savvy which many bosses are, to take care of personal matters themselves that there's no real excuse to have their secretaries do it. For many, it seems to be just another way to exercise power over one's subordinates. And for most, that's a sexism issue because, by and large, the bosses are men and the subordinates are women.
The grey area between secretary and servant is often tricky to navigate. Take HIPAA, for instance. What started out as a way to protect patient privacy has become a nightmare for the secretary trying to find out information about her boss' family's claims status. "How are you related to the patient?" I'm not, I work for the family. "I'm sorry, we can't give out any information unless the family [jumps through various hoops to basically give the secretary power of attorney]." Many doctor's offices nowadays won't even let you schedule an appointment for someone to whom you're not related.
Mostly, being a secretary-servant means you get used to being treated as both indispensable and of little value simultaneously. If you work in an office with less than a couple dozen employees, chances are you're the only secretary, and if the office doesn't employ temps you can't take vacation days unless the boss approves (in some cases this means you don't go away unless he does) and there's nothing pending that only you can do. You learn to schedule your life around your boss' and his family's, to make their concerns your own even if you're not Elmer J. Fudd, Millionaire who owns a mansion and a yacht. You also learn very quickly that any compassion you show is unlikely to be reciprocated, that your presence is going to be taken for granted, that as a de facto servant you're often regarded as being lower on the totem pole than if you were "just" an employee not directly reporting to the person at the top.
The up-side? If you're lucky you get paid more. You get to vicarously experience a lifestyle you will never be able to actually live even if you do get paid more. Your abritrarily-assigned tasks are often impossible but never boring. And you can make lots of high-level contacts which may serve you well in your quest for a job that doesn't assume you want to be a servant.
• The When Fangirls Attack gals both have terrific posts up - Kalinara explains why she hates token female characters, and Ragnell explores her adolescent (and adult) power fantasies.
• Natalie Bennett, whose Friday Femmes Fatales posts are must-reading (here's the most recent one) and who started the Carnival of the Feminists ball rolling (the latest CotF is posted today), has a good international perspective of the day.
• Twisty has another good international link roundup.
• Susie Madrak discusses the situation for women and girls in Ethiopia.
• Ms K at au lait also has an African perspective on the day.
• Chris Clarke has a good one on the glaring omission of women in a famous text from 1967 about the environment.
• Mel at Chandrasutra has a great idea for a Women's Day "'meme' of four." If I have time and energy tonight I'll try to tackle that one, which requires a bit of thought.
• Jill at Feministe is link-happy as well, with a terrific overview post. Alas, she'll be taking a break from blogging for a bit, and will be greatly missed.
• Amanda at Pandagon rallies the troops.
• Elise relates the story of two Hasidim who refused to understand that their flight wasn't Mechitza Airlines (and who were, unfortunately, backed up by the carrier in question).
• Pseudo-Adrienne repros NOW's message.
• Rana has another terrific essay up, this time about how All Our Bodies Belong To Us.
• Tresy notes that IWD is invisible to the mainstream US media. It's also invisible to most male progressive bloggers, as I mention below.
• Lastly, Hugo Schwyzer comes through in spades, with a long dissertation on his own anti-sexist work.
Update: I'm rather disappointed that, as of 8 PM today, my Bloglines subs show no other men on my blogroll writing about International Women's Day. A few have paid tribute to Dana Reeve, and a few others have talked about the South Dakota anti-abortion crazies in power, but nothing about IWD and no blogging against sexism whatsoever. As was pointed out a number of times amongst comics bloggers during the recent sexual harassment episode, it's not up to women to change their behavior, it's up to men to recognize that this happens and talk about it and try to prevent future occurrences through changed behavior and raising their own consciousness. Otherwise, even something like International Women's Day gets marginalized, and I'm pretty darn tired of the majority of the world's population being made constantly invisible like this.









